Information, Uncertainty, and Subjective Entitlements in Bargaining
نویسندگان
چکیده
Information, Uncertainty, and Subjective Entitlements in Bargaining More often than not production processes are the joint endeavor of people having different abilities and productivities. Such production processes and the associated surplus production are often not fully transparent in the sense that the relative contributions of involved agents are blurred; either by lack of information about the actual performance of collaborators or because of random noise in the production process or both. These variables likely influence the surplus sharing negotiations following the production. By means of a laboratory experiment, we systematically investigate their role for the whole bargaining process from opening offers to (dis)agreements and find that uncertainties in surplus production and (even) a very coarse performance information lead to bargaining asymmetries. In addition, we find that bargainers’ subjective entitlements are also influenced by performance information and the randomness inherent in the production process. These differences in subjective entitlements together with the differences in entitlements between better and worse performers influence the whole bargaining process and significantly contribute to the differences in bargaining outcomes. JEL Classification: C790, C920, D010, D290, D630, D890, M590
منابع مشابه
Performance Information, Production Uncertainty, and Subjective Entitlements in Bargaining
We experimentally explore the effects and interactions of three variables considered important when bargaining over a jointly produced surplus: performance information, production uncertainties when translating performance into output, and subjective entitlements derived from the production process. We find that without performance information subjective entitlements are mostly mutually consist...
متن کاملMoral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims
In many business transactions, in labor-management relations, in international conflicts, and welfare state reforms bargainers hold strong entitlements that are often generated by claims that are not feasible any more. These entitlements seem to considerably shape negotiation behavior. By using the novel setup of a ‘bargaining with claims’ experiment we provide new systematic evidence tracking ...
متن کاملDEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND The Effect of Historical Entitlements in Cooperative Bargaining Over Environmental Policy: An Experimental Test
Collaborative policy making has been an increasingly popular method of solving use conflicts on public lands. Representatives of interested groups are authorized to negotiate land use policy in the shadow of a government imposed backstop policy. This process can be modeled using cooperative game theory over multiple goods in an Edgeworth Box framework, and its outcomes predicted using axiomatic...
متن کاملFeasible sets, comparative risk aversion, and comparative uncertainty aversion in bargaining
We study feasible sets of the bargaining problem under two different assumptions: the players are subjective expected utility maximizers or the players are Choquet expected utility maximizers. For the latter case, we consider the effects on bargaining solutions when players become more risk averse and when they become more uncertainty averse. JEL Classification: C78, D81
متن کاملEquitable Risk Allocation in Construction Projects: Fuzzy Bargaining Game Approach
An equitable risk allocation between contracting parties plays a vital role in enhancing the performance of the project. This research presents a new quantitative risk allocation approach by integrating fuzzy logic and bargaining game theory. Owing to the imprecise and uncertain nature of players’ payoffs at different risk allocation strategies, fuzzy logic is implemented to determine the value...
متن کامل